<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reputation Report &#187; Telegraph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reputationreport.com.au/tag/telegraph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au</link>
	<description>Information - Insight - Influence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:01:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IPCC: Inglorious Basterds</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2010/02/ipcc-shame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2010/02/ipcc-shame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSR & Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inglorious basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipcc fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajendra Pachauri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputational risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationreport.com.au/?p=623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were conned. I thought the scientists couldn't be wrong. Little did I know they used no science, indulged in carbon trading, and established businesses that could profit...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2010/02/ipcc-shame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
