<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reputation Report &#187; ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reputationreport.com.au/tag/ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au</link>
	<description>Information - Insight - Influence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:01:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IPCC: Inglorious Basterds</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2010/02/ipcc-shame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2010/02/ipcc-shame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSR & Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inglorious basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipcc fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajendra Pachauri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputational risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationreport.com.au/?p=623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were conned. I thought the scientists couldn't be wrong. Little did I know they used no science, indulged in carbon trading, and established businesses that could profit...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2010/02/ipcc-shame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The long battle (with GE, BHP, McMoRan, Dow, Rio, etc)</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/the-long-battle-with-ge-bhp-mcmoran-dow-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/the-long-battle-with-ge-bhp-mcmoran-dow-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSR & Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate social responsibility (CSR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Chemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental devastation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freeport-McMoRan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ok Tedi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputational risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Tinto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationreport.com.au/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have over time, systematically damaged the necessary biodiversity that had maintained river health for millennia, by both direct and indirect actions...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/the-long-battle-with-ge-bhp-mcmoran-dow-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Ban James Hardie Directors; No One Hurt</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/dont-ban-james-hardie-directors-no-one-hurt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/dont-ban-james-hardie-directors-no-one-hurt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sin & Spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate social responsibility (CSR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSR & Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Hardie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputational risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationreport.com.au/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 23rd, 2009, Justice I Gzell, presiding over a civil action brought by Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) against James Hardie and its directors...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/dont-ban-james-hardie-directors-no-one-hurt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was it an Offer or an Ask?</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/was-it-an-offer-or-an-ask/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/was-it-an-offer-or-an-ask/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSR & Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate social responsibility (CSR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Nuttall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputational risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Tinto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationreport.com.au/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, I’m the last person I would expect to be defending brown paper bag transactions, but I find myself questioning a certain righteousness flavouring the reporting of certain recent events. Let’s go to Rio... ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/was-it-an-offer-or-an-ask/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supply Chain CSR</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/supply-chain-reputation-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/supply-chain-reputation-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSR & Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate social responsibility (CSR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputational risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woolworths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationreport.com.au/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is so much more than  corporate philanthropy or indulging in CSR reporting. If you truly want to be seen as a socially responsible organisation (surely the true meaning and ultimate goal of CSR programs?) then socially responsible behaviour; those values you claim to be so important to you, have to become part of the corporate DNA. News Limited’s One Degree  program is a good example of a company reducing its carbon footprint and expanding the impact of this by taking the message to its customers. I applaud the initiative: Every person, every company, everywhere, just making one small change at a time, could result in some very big outcomes worldwide.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/supply-chain-reputation-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lemon Cars</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/lemon-cars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/lemon-cars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sin & Spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon volvo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputational risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[response matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volvo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volvo reputation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationreport.com.au/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even the best manufacturers make the occasional lemon, but the difference between the automotive industry and others, is that the others immediately replace faulty products. But not Volvo. To put a driver at risk, to insult a customer is more preferable than to admit...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/07/lemon-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Image 1, Reality 0</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/06/public-image-1-reality-0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/06/public-image-1-reality-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sin & Spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repuation risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputational risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationreport.com.au/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch (now part of Bank of America) understood the value of reputation. As a financial services company providing advice to clients as to the placement of their investments, dependent as it is on the fees arising from that advice and related transactions, reputation is everything. Reputation is founded in the squishy intangibles of trust, ethics, good governance and conduct. The old Merrill Lynch knew a lot about the value of these qualities, as they were often accused of not having any by their employees. Most ultimately ex-employees...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reputationreport.com.au/2009/06/public-image-1-reality-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
